SaaSDossier

OpenAI vs Anthropic — Published Security Evidence Compared

OpenAI and Anthropic are read against the same 55-field framework, so their published security evidence can be viewed on consistent terms. The OpenAI dossier is the free Public Edition; Anthropic is a Licensed Edition. Each field is either Documented or recorded as a Question surfaced. This page previews coverage by domain, not field contents.

Bringing an AI vendor into a business usually opens a third-party risk assessment. Before a vendor security questionnaire or DDQ, SaaSDossier organises each vendor's published security evidence into a finished, source-linked record, so a team can see what is Documented, what becomes a Question surfaced, and what still needs follow-up before procurement, onboarding or deeper review. It supports the buyer's work; it does not complete the questionnaire, score the vendor or make the approval decision.

SaaSDossier™ reads OpenAI and Anthropic against the same 55-field framework, so their published security evidence can be viewed on consistent terms. The OpenAI dossier is the free Public Edition; Anthropic is a Licensed Edition. Each uses the states Documented and Question surfaced. This page previews coverage by domain, not field contents.

Two states. No third. No judgment.

Documented

The field was found in the vendor's published sources, quoted and cited in the vendor's own words.

Question surfaced

Reviewed vendor-published sources did not establish the field for the evidence date. This does not establish absence of the control.

Comparison · Side by side

Cover of the OpenAI Security Evidence Dossier
Public Edition · Dossier No. 003

OpenAI

47 Documented8 Questions surfacedof 55

Evidence date 22 June 2026 · 14 vendor pages reviewed

Source-linked · reviewed before release

Cover of the Anthropic Security Evidence Dossier
Licensed Edition · Dossier No. 004

Anthropic

47 Documented8 Questions surfacedof 55

Evidence date 24 June 2026 · 14 vendor pages reviewed

Source-linked · reviewed before release

US$1,500 · one-time View Get on Whop

See the format first, then decide. See all 55 fields in the free OpenAI ledger →

Frequently asked

What do “Documented” and “Question surfaced” mean?
Those are the only two states. Documented means the field was found in the vendor's published sources, quoted and cited. Question surfaced means: “Reviewed vendor-published sources did not establish the field for the evidence date. This does not establish absence of the control.” It is a prompt for your own follow-up, never a judgment.
Does a dossier decide whether a vendor is good or bad?
No. A dossier records what the vendor publishes — nothing more. There is no third state and no number that says good or bad. It gives you the vendor's own record so you can reach your own conclusion: clarity before commitment.
Where does the evidence come from?
Only from the vendor's own published pages — trust and security centers, privacy and legal pages, data-processing terms, status pages, and subprocessor lists. Every line traces to a source. Each dossier includes a SHA-256 identifier tied to the reviewed evidence record used for that release. No third-party articles or opinions are used as evidence.
Can I see the format before I buy?
Yes. The OpenAI Public Edition is free and complete — the same 55-field framework, evidence ledger, source register, and integrity record as every Licensed Edition. The clearest way to inspect the format before licensing a vendor dossier.
Disclaimer. SaaSDossier is independent documentation research and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or certified by any vendor reviewed. Built from vendor-published sources reviewed at the time of preparation. SaaSDossier is a compiled evidence record — not an audit, certification, rating, legal opinion, vendor approval, or substitute for professional vendor-risk, legal, procurement, GRC, vCISO, or security review.

Related references